in other words

Everything you ever wanted to know about the art market but didn't know who to ask

Indigestible Meat

An Important Paul Thek Sculpture Slipped Through Our Hands

Paul Thek, Meat Sculpture with Butterflies (1966) (from the series "Technological Reliquaries") © Estate of George Paul Thek, Courtesy Alexander and Bonin, New York. Photo credit: D. James Dee

BY Gary Garrels
Elise S. Haas Senior Curator of Painting and Sculpture, San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

In Passions

I have never been able to forgive myself for losing the opportunity to acquire a work by Paul Thek for the museum. Meat Sculpture with Butterflies (1966) appeared as a fragment of a blackened torso on which very beautiful, colorful butterflies have alighted.

The museum didn’t have a Thek in its collection—it still doesn’t—so when this work was offered to the museum by Ted Bonin from Alexander and Bonin gallery in 1995, I became very excited to present it to our accessions committee.

I completely underestimated the lack of familiarity with Thek’s work of the committee members. Not only did they not know the artist, they reviled the work. What I saw as an incredibly beautiful, poignant and vulnerable work, they found affronting and disturbing.

At that time, I think it was priced under $100,000, which isn’t an insignificant sum but would not have been a huge stretch for the museum. Today, its value would be at least $1m—it’s an important work of exceptional quality and is now in an important institutional collection in Europe, so it will never again be available.

By missing this work, there is a gap in our collection that will probably never be filled. It’s too late: we missed the window. I saw it as a perfect work for the museum. Typically, I try to find the right work for the context of this collection and this community, not just any work by an artist. I felt this was the perfect piece for this museum and for San Francisco. Thek is a crucially important artist of the 1960s, and we had been acquiring other works by 60s artists such as Eva Hesse and Bruce Nauman. This work would have been a perfect complement.

The rejection is seared in me. I think about it often and it still gives me incredible pain and sadness. I continue to chastise myself because it really was my error. I simply didn’t prepare the committee members adequately.

Usually if I am bringing challenging work to the committee, I speak to members individually in advance of the meeting so they have a fuller understanding of the work and the artist, then I know there is support going into the meeting. I didn’t do that in this case and the work had almost unanimous opposition.

I didn’t realize how unknown Thek was, or how challenging this work was. The experience shook me into realizing how easy it is to become presumptuous about your own experiences with art. I had fallen madly in love with this work, but I shouldn’t have assumed that other people would have at least something of the same experience.

You may also like...

Banned Art

The 80th Anniversary of Degenerate Art

By Richard Aronowitz

Busting the Guarantees Myths

Getting to Grips With Auction House Practices

By Adam Chinn

Towering Achievements

By Louisa Buck